Bruce Friedrich is executive director of The Good Food Institute (GFI), a nonprofit organization that promotes plant... Bruce Friedrich is executive director of The Good Food Institute (GFI), a nonprofit organization that promotes plant and culture-based alternatives to animal agriculture, and founding partner of New Crop Capital (NCC), a venture capital firm that provides angel, seed, and Series A funding to companies that are producing plant-based and cultured alternatives to meat, dairy, and eggs, as well to tech startups that are focused on promoting alternatives to animal agriculture. Bruce graduated manga cum laude, Order of the Coif, from the Georgetown University Law Center and Phi Beta Kappa from Grinnell College. He also holds degrees from Johns Hopkins University and the London School of Economics and Political Science. Bruce's photo by Jo-Anne McArthur Read more about Bruce Friedrich, Farm Sanctuary Read More
There are three concepts that animate my decision to eat a vegan diet.
Eating a vegan diet applies the “Golden Rule” across the species barrier. Most people seem to understand this concept where dogs and cats are concerned — most of us would recoil at the idea of eating Fido or Fluffy, absent some apocalyptic scenario. I see chickens, pigs, fish, and cattle in the same way — there is no moral difference between eating a dog or a pig, a cat or a chicken.
Eating a vegan diet means that every time I sit down to eat, I’m choosing to Support a less cruel world. Where I can make choices in opposition to violence and killing, shouldn’t I? There is a lot of suffering in the world, and the vast majority of it is beyond our control. But choosing to eat a plant-based diet is something we can all do, and it takes a stand on behalf of a kinder world — at every single meal.
Eating a vegan diet recognizes that morally speaking, killing and paying someone else to kill are indistinguishable actions. I would not personally slice animals’ throats, and so I don’t want to pay others to do that for me. Of course, all of us could spend an afternoon shucking corn, watching a factory turn plants into plant-based foods, and so on. We could all take part in every other aspect of getting plant-based foods to the table. But most of us would recoil at being asked to castrate animals, slice animals’ beaks off, and kill them. I feel like I’m in deeper integrity when I’m not paying others to do things to animals that I oppose.
In sum, it seems to me that every time we sit down to eat, we make a choice about who we are in the world. Choosing a plant-based diet casts our vote for a more compassionate world, recognizes that animals are not disposable commodities, and rejects Support for practices that we would find morally objectionable if we had to do them personally.
And that’s something to celebrate!
Image source: Renee Press/Fire and Earth Kitchen
You must be Login to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
Feeling suffering/pain is incredibly useful for survival so I think it likely (and newer research seems to be confirming) that plants also feel pain and discomfort. I know that my lack of empathy for plants is based on their difference from me, logically though I can\’t think of a reason why plants should suffer more than animals. While some methods of livestock farming care little for animal suffering no agricultural method attempts to mitigate vegetable suffering. Slowly dying plants are even usually on display in most supermarkets. I am not sure I can support an industry like this. If only we humans could photosynthesise, then we wouldn\’t need to take life to live.
I agree that there is no moral difference between killing a dog and killing a chicken.
I assert though that there IS a moral difference between killing an animal and killing a person.
We humans have more moral worth; animals have less.
No animal is worth a human life. And I believe that animals may justifiably be killed to benefit humans (food source, clothing, research, etc.). Humanely, of course.
"We humans have more moral worth; animals have less." There\’s no scientific basis for that statement.
Do you think it\’s justifiable to kill animals for human benefit even when it\’s not a necessity, but a preference?
This is just a typical comment of a person who wants to justify why they eat meat and wear leather, wool etc…ALL lives have a worth, we should treat ALL animals with respect, we do NOT NEED to eat them, wear them or kill them