Jareb Gleckel received his J.D. magna cum laude from Cornell Law School and his B.A.... Jareb Gleckel received his J.D. magna cum laude from Cornell Law School and his B.A. magna cum laude from Amherst College. His academic writing focuses on the questions surrounding new food products, specifically plant-based and cell-based meat, and is available on SSRN. He is a founding editor of Oyez's newest platform about U.S. Supreme Court arguments, Oral Argument 2.0. He also writes guest columns for Justia's Verdict and performs legal research for the Animal Law Podcast. Read more about Jareb Gleckel Read More
To scientists, it is no longer a secret that animal agriculture is one of the major causes of climate change. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) conservatively estimates that livestock is responsible for 14.5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions, while other reports argue it contributes as much as 51%. And Climate change itself is only one small part of the meat industry’s environmental massacre; greenhouse gas numbers do not touch on deforestation, water use, and water pollution.
This information is hardly new. Jennifer Jacquet, associate professor of environmental studies at NYU, told DeSmog that the FAO’s report Livestock’s Long Shadow was the first high-profile revelation about the meat industry’s climate impact, and the FAO released that report back in 2006. But the meat industry is still pushing back on this environmental data—successfully. So over five months, DeSmog decided to investigate the meat industry’s advertising and lobbying.
According to the DeSmog investigation, the meat industry “playbook” consists of four primary strategies:
It is important to understand that these industry promises are empty because It is impossible for the meat industry to ever be environmentally neutral, let alone efficient because as research shows (and common sense substantiates!) it is inefficient to convert plant calories to animal calories; animals need to eat more plant calories to survive and grow than they provide as food for humans. Beef is the least efficient source of calories and protein at a 3% conversion rate.
It isn’t easy to hold massive industries accountable for misinformation. In the early 2000s, the Department of Justice brought a successful lawsuit against major tobacco companies, but United States lawsuits are still struggling to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for Climate change. In a recent development, the United States Supreme Court made it easier for energy companies to defend their cases in federal court as opposed to state court, which the energy companies consider to be more favorable forums.
But legal progress may be more promising on an international scale. Bloomberg reported that approximately 1,800 Climate change lawsuits are in progress worldwide. And in the first Danish climate lawsuit, three non-profit organizations argue that Danish Crown’s climate-friendly advertising campaign is misleading to consumers. As these lawsuits progress, it is important for media outlets to hold the meat industry accountable in the court of public opinion.
To learn more about the environmental impacts of animal agriculture in One Green Planet, and how switching to a plant-based diet can help, you can read:
For more Animal, Earth, Life, Vegan Food, Health, and Recipe content published daily, subscribe to the One Green Planet Newsletter! Lastly, being publicly funded gives us a greater chance to continue providing you with high-quality content. Please consider supporting us by donating!
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.

Comments: