Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
Download food monster: the biggest, baddest, yummiest vegan food app!
single

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR Newsletter

  GET FOOD MONSTER AppX

There is a lot of controversy surrounding the topic of fracking. While some people are up in arms against it, others look at it as the key to energy independence. So what the frack? What is fracking in the first place and why does it have the world taking sides?

Hydraulic fracturing (fracking for short) is the process of extracting natural gas from ancient bedrock. Natural gas is thought to be a “cleaner” alternative to coal as it emits less greenhouse gases when burned. Fracking is not a new practice, but gained popularity in the past decade as a viable source of energy to get the United States off foreign oil.

The process of fracking involves pumping millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals deep into the ground to create fissures in the bedrock. These fissures allow natural gases to escape from their ancient trappings where they are collected to generate energy.

While an alternative to coal is a good thing, natural gas is not by any means carbon-neutral. There are also many environmental hazards associated with fracking. The bottom line is, scientists and geologists alike are still unsure of all the potential consequences fracking may cause, but the things we do know are not all too promising. Here are just five of many downsides to fracking.

1. Water Pollution

Fracking poses a serious threat to fresh water stores where fracking takes place. To create fissures in rock formations, millions of gallons of water, sand, and a chemical cocktail (including formaldehyde, acetic acid, and boric acid to name a few) are put into wells at very high pressures. Depending on the geology of the area, between 25 and 75 percent of this contaminated water returns to the surface as wastewater that is then collected and injected deep underground. This water is highly toxic and more often than not finds its way into aquifers and surface water or seeps into soil. In the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania, more than 1,544 gas wells were cited of violations in 2010 alone. Food and Water Watch reports that the massive amount of water required by fracking will exacerbate the global water crisis as contaminated water used in fracking can not be returned into the natural water cycle.

2. Negative Effects on Human Health

Sandra Steingraber, a scientist turned environmental activist, has written extensively on the correlation between fracking and cancer. According to Steingraber’s research, 25 percent of fracking fluid is composed of known carcinogens and chemicals that can migrate into public waters. In Pennsylvania and Wyoming, benzene and methane was found in groundwater and aquifers used for drinking water. Benzene has been strongly linked with childhood leukemia. Fracking also releases ionizing radiation from naturally occurring radium-226 and exposure to this sort of radiation has been linked to breast cancer. Wastewater from fracking cites often exhibits elevated levels of radiation as well as bromides that have been linked to bladder and colon cancer.

3. Negative Impact on Animal Health

Fracking fluid not only contains chemicals that have been known to cause cancer, but it also contains a number of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs).  The U.S. Geological Survey reports that of the 750 chemicals used in fracking, over 100 are EDCs that have been linked to respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurological, and reproductive conditions. EDCs have been linked to sex changes in wildlife and contaminated waters have also caused fish deaths in Pennsylvania.

4. Threat to Farmers

In the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania, many farmers are being asked to lease their land to gas companies for fracking. While most farmers own their land rights, the mineral rights associated with the shale the farms sit on top of are up for grabs. Unable to afford lawyers to sue gas companies for the mineral rights to their land, farmers have been forced to abandon their farms. Farmers who do stay in areas that have begun fracking risk losing crops and livestock to fracking fluid contamination.

5. The Many Things We Still Don’t Know

The fact is, we still don’t really know what potential effect fracking can have on the planet. The process of fracking disrupts what Sandra Steingraber refers to as the planet’s “geological basement.”  Creating fissures in Precambrian (literally the first rock formed on Earth) bedrock has caused earthquakes in Pennsylvania and there are countless potential health hazards associated with fracking. The “Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas,” a pamphlet developed by the International Energy Agency, outlines the “numerous hurdles” that have yet to be overcome by the fracking industry, including problems of air pollution, the contamination of ground and surface waters, the risk of earthquakes, and the release of greenhouse gases that would produce a larger environmental footprint than conventional gas development.

Image Source: greensefa/Flickr

Want to read more posts like this? Sign up for our newsletter below!​

Browse through some recent posts below:

Think Buying Exotic Animals on Social Media Is a Cool Trend? Think Again

Martin Luther King’s Legacy Inspires Justice For Humans and Animals Alike

Martin Luther King's Legacy Inspires Justice For Humans and Animals Alike

Why You Should Never Share or Like These Baby Elephant Videos

Why You Should Never Share or Like Baby Elephant Videos

10 Documentaries that Will Make You Rethink Everything You Know About Animals

10 Documentaries that Will Make You Rethink Everything You Know About Animals

Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

4 comments on “Fracking Disgusting: 5 Reasons Why We Shouldn’t Frack”

Click to add comment
Yuri
9 Months Ago

Has any of this even been proven or is just lies


Reply
Robert Howlett
3 Years Ago

The upside of fracking is that Osborne’s father in law and his cronies will make a killing.


Reply
Samantha Cassol
3 Years Ago

Michael Reilly


Reply
Tyra Eichelberger Kremling
3 Years Ago

The main reason is. ....There are alternatives.


Reply
Jack
3 Years Ago

This is almost completely incorrect. There has never been a single proven case of ANY water contamination from fracking, which happens so far underground there is no way any wastewater, which is also disposed of incredibly deeply, could contaminate groundwater. A carcinogen is anything which has been linked to cancer. So theres a potential link, correlation does not equal causation, thats bad science. These chemicals are tested on mice in such high concentrations that a huge number of chemicals tested are called 'carcinogens', many chemicals we use in our day to day life. Fracking companies are required by law to give the composition of any fracking fluid (with by the way is 99.9% water and sand, and most of the rest is guar, which is used in ice cream...harmful?) of environment agencies, do you really think governments would let this go ahead if there was any serious risk? Your whole argument is based on lies, exaggerations and scare mongering. I recommend you watch less gasland and more fracknation/truthland to get facts instead of fiction


Reply


Subscribe to our Newsletter




Follow us on


Do Not Show This Again

×

Submit to OneGreenPlanet


Terms & Conditions ×
  GET FOOD MONSTER APPX