Lindsay Oberst is an Atlanta-based freelance writer, editor, journalist and creative writer, with a passion... Lindsay Oberst is an Atlanta-based freelance writer, editor, journalist and creative writer, with a passion for health and nutrition, social justice and sustainability. Find her on the Web at @LindsayOWrite, @LindsayOHealth, Google Plus or lindsayoberst.com. Some of her favorite things: words, mangoes, chia seeds and bright colors. Read more about Lindsay Oberst Read More
While trying to get healthy or taking on a more plant-based diet, many people continue to eat fish. After all, we’re told some fish is good for the brain, heart, and skin — especially fatty fish such as salmon — but a new analysis by the Environmental Working Group points out a different truth: People following the federal government’s guidelines on seafood consumption are likely consuming too much mercury or too few of the good-for-you omega-3 fatty acids. This means eating fish really isn’t good for our health, and it certainly isn’t necessary, especially for pregnant women and young children.
From the government and media, we hear a lot about eating fish. If you’re following dietary guidelines, you might aim to eat eight to 12 ounces of fish weekly, but is this too much?
EWG’s researchers found that eating fish randomly can be “ineffective and even dangerous.” Why? Because most of the commonly eaten species, including shrimp, are very low in omega-3s, and many people don’t consider how much mercury is in their fish dishes.
The Dietary Guidelines of 2011 downplayed the risk of mercury and other contaminants—yes, there are other toxins in fish, too—and said the benefits of eating fish outweighed the risks, even for pregnant women. But several recent studies mentioned in EWG’s report showed how children born to women with slightly elevated mercury levels suffered measurable brain and nervous system deficits or were more likely to be diagnosed with ADD.
HHS and USDA officials, along with scientific and medical experts, are meeting this month to plan for the 2015 Dietary Guidelines. Also, separate officials at the EPA and FDA are updating their 2004 fish-mercury advisory, which is expected to be released sometime this year.
Here are some other facts to consider from EWG’s findings:
As earlier reports discussed on OGP showed, even small amounts of the mercury in fish may be enough to restrict brain development or cause other health problems for humans. Also, radiation and mercury from fish isn’t good for your heart either. And due to Global warming, mercury in seafood is expected to increase.
If you’re still on the fence about fish on your plate, here are 5 good reasons why pescatarians don’t get it right when it comes to fish consumption.
Green Monsters: Will this information change how you eat?
Image Source: Gwen/Flickr
You must be Login to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
I have never read so much crap in all my life.
I lost 115lbs eating fish, am off BP and cholesterol medication.
Worried about mercury? Easy, limit tuna, swordfish and shark.
Eat the rest and lots of.
I worry more about the health of people that don’t eat fish more than those that do.
Oh good. That’s a relief. I don’t it anyway.