Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting... Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting sustainability and finding solutions to the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. Read more about Nicholas Vincent Read More
In a startling revelation, it turns out that the majority of companies sponsoring the upcoming UN climate talks, COP28 in Dubai, are not fully committed to cutting their greenhouse gas emissions in line with globally recognized net-zero targets. Shockingly, only one of the more than 20 sponsors has signed up to the UN-backed net zero science-based targets (SBTi).
Source: CBS News/YouTube
This analysis reveals a concerning trend among the corporate sponsors, including prominent names like Baker Hughes and Bank of America. These companies have yet to commit to reducing emissions to net zero within any specific timeframe under the SBTi system. The SBTi is known for its rigorous, science-based pathways for companies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Even more surprising is the case of EY (formerly Ernst and Young), the global accountancy firm hired as the independent verifier of the sponsors’ climate commitments. EY itself has not established targets with the net zero scheme, raising questions about its role in ensuring the credibility of the sponsors’ climate actions.
The COP28 sponsorship committee in the United Arab Emirates required organizations to submit their commitments to net zero and climate action as part of their sponsorship applications. However, the wording leaves room for sponsors to have “credible net zero transition plans by 2030 and 2050 based on SBTi,” which does not necessarily mean alignment with the SBTi.
This situation is concerning, especially when considering the role of these companies as sponsors of a major climate event. The analysis by Spendwell points out that while many of these companies claim to be climate leaders, their lack of verifiable commitments suggests otherwise. This inconsistency can be seen as a form of greenwashing, undermining the authenticity of their environmental pledges.
As the world looks to COP28 for leadership and action in tackling climate change, the findings of this analysis highlight the need for greater accountability and genuine commitment from corporate sponsors. The credibility of their environmental claims is not just about meeting targets but also about demonstrating real leadership in the fight against global heating.

There’s Only One Green Planet by Tiny Rescue: Climate Collection
Easy Ways to Help the Planet:
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
Comments: