2.4K Views 2 years ago

Green Activists Push Biden to Halt Deepwater Oil Export Rigs

Author Bio

Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting... Read More

Environmental groups are increasing pressure on President Joe Biden’s administration to halt new deepwater oil export facilities and to extend the pause on gas export licenses. These groups argue that the expansion of such facilities is detrimental to both the environment and public health.

Source: Disaster Diaries/YouTube

A coalition of 20 environmental organizations recently sent a letter to the US Department of Transportation, urging a re-evaluation of crude oil exports. The letter highlights the significant Pollution and environmental injustices these projects cause, potentially locking the nation into decades of fossil fuel dependence. This request follows Biden’s earlier decision to pause new licenses for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports.

Activists are also advocating for the indefinite extension of the LNG export license pause. They point to the massive emissions and the detrimental effects on Gulf of Mexico communities and ecosystems as reasons for this extension. Despite these concerns, the Biden administration has indicated that the current pause might end within a year.

Additionally, over 200 environmental groups have called on congressional leaders to stop funding fossil fuel extraction on federal lands and waters. They stress the urgent need to phase out oil, gas, and coal production to combat Climate change effectively. Ashley Nunes, a public lands policy specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity, emphasized the contradiction in continuing to fund fossil fuel activities while trying to protect the climate.

This movement seeks to resolve the conflicting policies of the Biden administration, which has simultaneously supported significant climate legislation and overseen a record increase in oil and gas production. The recent approval of the Sea Port oil terminal, a deepwater facility off the coast of Texas, has particularly angered campaigners. This terminal is set to handle up to 2 million barrels of oil daily once completed.

Proponents of these projects, like Jim Teague of Enterprise, argue that such terminals are environmentally safer and economically beneficial. However, opponents insist that new oil projects undermine global climate goals and exacerbate Pollution in already affected Gulf communities.

The renewed push for deepwater drilling, especially by companies like BP, responsible for the Deepwater Horizon spill, raises significant safety and environmental concerns. Critics argue that the regulatory system has not fundamentally changed since that disaster, leaving taxpayers and ecosystems at considerable risk.

As the debate continues, the Biden administration maintains its commitment to transitioning to a clean energy future. At the same time, the National Ocean Industries Association warns that limiting energy exports could harm both the US economy and global energy stability. This issue will likely be a significant point of contention in the upcoming election, with differing views on balancing presidential el environmental protection and energy needs.