JJ is a writer with a love for the planet and all of the creatures... JJ is a writer with a love for the planet and all of the creatures in it. She enjoys coming up with new plant based dishes, taking pictures of those dishes to put up on Instagram with a great filter and some pertinent hashtags and then eating those dishes. Yeah, she’s that person. She also likes to tell people she’s been drinking almond milk since before it was cool, has a small thrift store addiction and cannot pass up a garage sale. She lives with her two kids, two dogs and husband in the wild west. Read more about JJ Dolm Read More
What does the USDA even do? Seriously, we hear about this governmental agency all the time but, aside from vaguely knowing that they have something to do with farming somehow, does anyone really know what they actually do? They’re like the Barney Stinson of the government.
Part of the problem is, they wear a ton of hats, so it’s natural that there would be some confusion about what their real role is in our everyday lives. To try and explain it as succinctly as possible, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is the governmental agency that oversees American farming and agricultural interests, as well consumer food safety (among other random things like home loans, but we’re just going to worry about the big ones for now). They’re the ones that inspect the facilities that process the meat, cheese, eggs and produce that we find in the grocery store and they’re the ones that, pending inspections and review, approve products and processes (including packaging and labeling) as safe and accurate for consumers before they hit the shelves.
Specifically speaking of said approvals, the USDA has two inspection services that tackle this, the first of which is the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). They’re responsible for regulating all genetically engineered organisms and assisting in containing and eradicating agricultural pests and disease. The second is the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). They specifically oversee the production of dairy, eggs and meat and evaluate the processes employed to produce them for safety.
With these services in place, it would seem that consumer interests are being very throughly looked after. We mean, c’mon, when you involve that many acronyms what could go wrong, right? Well…

Just take a look at these half dozen things that the USDA has put their stamp of approval on and you tell us.
Potatoes bruise and brown naturally as well as release a potentially carcinogenic chemical when fried called acrylamide. The J.R. Simplot Company felt you shouldn’t have to stand for this inconvenience when chasing down a soft drink with a handful of papas fritas, so the largest supplier of fries to McDonald’s genetically modified a potato that stays prettier and releases less of the toxins due to suppression of certain genes in their RNA. While scientists have voiced reservations about the long term ramifications of this, the USDA felt that this was a great plan to forge ahead into the unknown with. Why wait on long term studies when there are potatoes to fry!
Despite huge public outcry, congressional opposition and even the pleas of around 800 farmers, the USDA approved genetically modified soybeans and cotton by Dow AgroSciences that can withstand the use of 2,4-D- (an active ingredient in Agent Orange) and glyphosate (the key ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide). You see, the weeds surrounding crops that had been previously modified to withstand Monsanto’s Round Up had become resistant, so the only real solution was coming up with a an even heartier crop that could withstand us unleashing chemical welfare on it (and ourselves…and surrounding crops…and the environment). In all likelihood, the weeds will end up becoming resistant to this too, at which point the only option will be to drop an A bomb on soy and cotton fields.
When the last of the horse meat processing plants were shuttered in 2007, people who were opposed to the cruel practice (which was a majority). About 80 percent of Americans Support a ban, as well as those who felt horses meat shouldn’t be consumed were pleased. Then, the USDA decided that it would be cool to approve the allocation of funds for inspections of a new plant opening in New Mexico in 2013. Fortunately, the omnibus spending bill at the beginning of 2014 reestablished a law that had been lifted in 2011 prohibiting spending on horse processing plant inspections, effectively nipping the practice in the bud. The USDA was willing to go with it though, so there’s that.
Called Arctic Apples, these bad boys have been genetically modified to resist browning. Designed (how weird that an apple can be “designed”) by Okanagan Specialty Fruits in Canada, the apples gained approval because the USDA found that “… based on a final plant pest risk assessment that finds the GE (genetically engineered) apples are unlikely to pose a plant pest risk to agriculture and other plants in the United States … [and] deregulation is not likely to have a significant impact on the human environment.” Yeah, words like “unlikely” and “not likely” aren’t really the same as “won’t” or “don’t.” Since the long term ramifications of these products are unknown, and preliminary evidence is pointing to negative human, animal and environmental effects, the USDA’s “Meh, s’probably fine,” attitude is a bit worrisome.
Approved back in 2001 by the USDA, this product is an amalgamation of beef scraps that have been treated with an antibacterial agent to render it safe for human consumption. Oh, that antibacterial agent is ammonia. Despite recent studies indicating that the ammonia is causing digestive, blood vessel, liver and kidney issues as well as the leftover pathogens in processed beef and chicken products causing more than one third of food borne related illness hospitalizations, the USDA continues to stand behind their approval of the product. They also don’t require manufacturers to indicate that their products contain it. Who happens to be a large consumer of this stuff? Schools.
It kinda goes without saying that the poultry farming practices in the United States, those directly overseen by the USDA, have some flaws. And by flaws we mean glaring cruelty and public health issues. Is there something we can do as a country to fix the issue? Hey, why don’t we start importing poultry from other countries and take their word for it that everything is up to snuff in their processes!
A USDA audit found that chickens from China were “safe, wholesome, unadulterated, and properly labeled,” and concluded that their plants were up to the same processing standards as those found in the U.S. Of course, no one from the USDA will actually inspect the plants to ensure proper protocols are continually followed, oh and, yeah, China is kinda notorious for poultry-related illnesses sickening people and animals. What’s more, because the chickens are born here, sent to China for processing, and then exported back (that sounds pretty environmentally friendly, now doesn’t it?), the chickens don’t need to bear a “Country of Origin” sticker. Awesome. And by awesome, we mean who in the f$% thought this was a good idea. Oh yeah, the USDA.

Lead Image Credit: Nation of Change
You must be Login to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
USDA has done many evil things in the past including their nutrition suggestions but eating horse meat is not one of them. There is nothing cruel about it if done correctly, wild horses are numerous and it is healthy eating if cooked at low temperatures just like beef, pork and fish should be.
I am in total agreement with all you have pointed out about the USDA. They are a joke and how much do we pay them to be this horrible organization that we can\’t depend on. You didn\’t point out the insane way they handle the Puppy Mills. People have been fighting that horrific situation for years. Even Opra in 2008 had a show dedicated to the inhumane conditions. The head of the USDA(a real idiot, that of course couldn\’t answer any question) was on TV. We the People need to fire a bunch of people who have put themselves in power. Not to protect us! Who can make the most money. Sincerely
If you are in total agreement you are misinformed about consuming horse meat…
Just wow.
1) So more carcinogens are good for you? Are you kidding me? Oh, and what scientists have said anything bad about these potatoes?
2) So you admit that they didn\’t approve Agent Orange. Just one of the two ingredients in it.You know, the one that WASN\’T the problem. You know the one we\’ve never stopped using.
3) Lots of people eat horse. If you eat steak, pork or chicken, you have no moral reason to object.
4) The arctic apple still goes bad, just doesn\’t brown nearly as quickly. Of course there is nothing wrong with eating a browned apple, but people don\’t, so they get thrown out. Guess you are fond of food waste?
5) They have been doing that for 30 years. No known negative affects. Whi
6) Chickens are raised in the US, slaughtered here, shipped frozen to China. China butchers them, keeps the dark meat, cooks the white meat into patties/ nuggets, freezes them and ships them back. Chickens never ingest anything while in China.
Sheesh
Arthur…Glad to see someone who isn\’t a gullible moron who believes any of this article is even remotely correct. Obviously written by someone who has NO…ZERO..science background let alone common sense.
Bob, the fact is that USDA has supported industry often times and neglected the health of consumers. One case in point is there nutritional guidelines. However, not everything they do is bad of course, and I am in full agreement with proper slaughter and consumption of horse meat.
Your comment to the other extreme is no more helpful or correct than the faulty article.