Petition: Police Checked This Waterbury Address and Found Two Healthy Dogs. Five Weeks Later They Were Emaciated.

On 28 August, Waterbury police went to an address on Marley Place in Waterbury, Connecticut. A video circulating online appeared to show a woman abusing two dogs at the property, and officers went to see for themselves. They found a pit bull mix and a husky mix who, in the department’s words, appeared healthy, with no signs of abuse or neglect. Marilyn Valdez, 22, was arrested and charged over the video. The dogs stayed where they were.

Officers came back to the same address at twenty past two in the morning on 30 September. This time both dogs were emaciated and being kept in what police described as deplorable living conditions. Isaiah Ortiz, 23, was charged with two counts of cruelty to animals. He posted bond and was arraigned on 6 October. He has been charged, not convicted.

Thirty-three days separate those two visits. Both dogs are alive, both are in the custody of Waterbury Animal Control, and both are being treated.

Sign the Petition

The uncomfortable part is not that nobody looked. Somebody did look, on the strength of a video, at the right address, and wrote down that the animals were fine. A dog can lose a devastating amount of condition in five weeks, and an August welfare check cannot see September. But a check that produces a clean note also closes a file, and a closed file is why the second call came from officers on a routine overnight response rather than from anyone following up.

This is the recurring structural failure in neglect cases, and it is not unique to Connecticut. OGP’s coverage of a Colorado case in which a mother dog and her puppies starved to death turned on the same gap between what a household looks like from the doorstep and what it is. The visit is treated as the intervention. It isn’t one. It is a snapshot, and a snapshot of an animal who still has weight on them tells you nothing about the household they are about to go on living in.

There is a second reason this case needs watching. Two people have now been charged over animals at one address in two separate incidents, which tends to complicate a prosecution rather than strengthen it. Responsibility gets divided, each defendant points at the other, and two cases that would each be serious alone dilute into a pair of misdemeanours.

The petition asks the Waterbury State’s Attorney to prosecute the cruelty counts rather than reduce them, and asks that neither dog be returned to the address they came from. It also asks for a prohibition on owning animals attached to any conviction. On the record so far, returning them would mean returning them to the property where a welfare check already found nothing wrong once.

Add Your Name

The sequence of both visits, and the condition of the dogs at each, is reported by WFSB in Connecticut.

Sign These Urgent Petitions!

• He Was Banned From Owning Dogs. Goose Creek Found 35 of Them and Four Graves.
• Chance Was Dropped Off for Training. The Warrant Found 18 Starving Dogs.
• Police Said 69 Dead Cats. Then They Counted Again and Found 86.