Sarah Moulds, a former primary school teacher, was filmed kicking and striking her horse, Bruce Almighty. The video went viral, attracting widespread condemnation and legal action according to reporting done by The Guardian. However, Moulds has been cleared of animal cruelty charges.
Source: The Telegraph/YouTube
The incident, which occurred on November 6, 2021, in Gunby, Lincolnshire, showed Moulds disciplining her grey pony after they unexpectedly moved into the road, dragging a child who was holding the lead rope. The video captured Moulds kicking the horse in the chest and striking their face. Following the video’s virality, Moulds faced severe backlash, lost her teaching job, and received death threats.
After a three-day trial at the Lincoln crown court, a jury deliberated for over five hours before acquitting Moulds of causing unnecessary suffering to a protected animal under the Animal Welfare Act 2006. This verdict, while legally decisive, brings to light the complexities of the situation.
Moulds argued that her intent was not to harm the horse but to discipline them for their sudden and potentially dangerous behavior. She stated that her actions were swift and minimal, motivated by concern for the child’s safety and the horse’s future interactions with children. While equine veterinary surgeon Suzanne Green testified that the horse would have experienced pain and fear from Moulds’ actions, Moulds’ defense emphasizes the immediate need to prevent a potentially life-threatening situation.
While the video of Moulds does beg us to do more research regarding viral videos, the harm she could have done to her horse cannot be overlooked.
Sign this petition to help end horse abuse.

Ahisma Tee By Tiny Rescue: Animal Collection
Easy Ways to Help the Planet:
You must be Login to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.

Everyone is for animal “welfare” reforms: But animals are still property, and the property “owners” — whether scientists in a laboratory; agribusiness CEOs on the factory farm; or the management of rodeos, circuses, and zoos — have every right to do what they wish to animal bodies. The legal rationale are two-fold: any act causing animal suffering is acceptable so long as it is part of a “tradition” of animal exploitation and/or has some “rational” purpose such as making profit or “disciplining” an animal. Thus, while the burning or beating of a cat or dog is a felony crime in many states, this is so because it has no redeemable utilitarian function for society, not because it is intrinsically wrong. Where animals are property, the property rights of individual animal “owners” trump public moral concerns, such as voiced by animal advocacy groups, and many a just battle has been lost in the courts through an exploiter’s appeal to “ownership” rights over animals.–from Dr. Steven Best’s essay “Legally Blind: The Case For Granting Animals Rights”