1.6K Views 2 years ago

Humans Pose Greater Threat as Virus Vectors to Animals

When it comes to the spread of disease, the finger often points at animals like rats as carriers of illnesses. However, recent research has shed light on a surprising truth: when it comes to the spread of viruses, humans are often the primary culprits, posing a significant threat to other species.

An analysis of viral genomes conducted by Cedric Tan and his team at University College London has uncovered a startling statistic: in 64 percent of cases where viruses jump between humans and other animals, it is humans infecting animals, rather than the reverse. This revelation challenges the conventional narrative and underscores the substantial role humans play in the transmission of diseases to other species.

The study, drawing from a global database of sequenced viruses, examined nearly 60,000 high-quality sequences with comprehensive accompanying data. Through the construction of viral “family trees,” the researchers identified thousands of viral lineages and documented over 3000 instances of cross-species transmission. Astonishingly, the majority of these transmissions—599 out of the total—originated from humans and spread to other animals. This phenomenon, while unexpected, finds its rationale in the size and global dispersion of the human population. With humans inhabiting virtually every corner of the planet, viruses circulating within human populations have ample opportunities to spill over into diverse animal species worldwide. In contrast, viruses confined to specific non-human species face limited avenues for transmission beyond their localized habitats.

The study highlights several notable instances of virus transmission from humans to animals, including the infamous cases of SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, and influenza viruses. These viruses have been documented in infections among various animal populations, ranging from pets and zoo animals to farmed species like mink and even wild creatures like white-tailed deer.

Even after excluding well-known viruses like SARS-CoV-2 and influenza from the analysis, the researchers found that a significant portion—54 percent—of cross-species transmissions stemmed from humans. This indicates that the threat posed by human-mediated virus transmission extends beyond high-profile outbreaks.

The implications of these findings extend beyond mere epidemiological curiosity. The spread of viruses from humans to other species poses a grave threat to wildlife, particularly endangered animals. Instances of outbreaks among wild chimpanzees in Uganda, resulting in fatalities due to human metapneumovirus and human respirovirus, reveal the devastating consequences of such transmissions.