1.6K Views 2 years ago

Colorado Supreme Court to Decide on Animal Rights Case Involving Zoo Elephants

In an upcoming case, the Colorado Supreme Court will determine whether animals are entitled to bodily liberty and if a “next friend” can legally represent them in court. This case, set to be heard on October 24, stems from a lawsuit filed by the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) on behalf of elephants held at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo in Colorado Springs.

The concept of a “next friend” refers to an individual or organization that represents another party in legal proceedings. In this instance, the NhRP has stepped in, claiming to represent the interests of the zoo’s elephants, whom they argue are suffering in captivity and deserve to be relocated to a sanctuary.

Courtney Fern of the NhRP has been actively involved in the case, describing the elephants’ current living conditions as restrictive. “I was just there yesterday. It’s such a small exhibit on the side of the mountain,” she said, emphasizing the elephants’ limited space. The NhRP argues that these majestic animals, which can cover hundreds or even tens of thousands of square miles in the wild, are confined to enclosures that allow only minimal movement.

Fern explained that the group’s goal is to see the elephants moved to a sanctuary where they can live in a more natural and spacious environment. Although a district court in Colorado Springs dismissed the lawsuit, the state’s highest court has agreed to take it up, offering the NhRP renewed hope.

“We’re very confident, and we look forward to arguing against the zoo and presenting our case,” Fern said.

The Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, however, maintains that the NhRP lacks standing to represent the elephants. The zoo asserts that it, not the NhRP, is the true “next friend” of the elephants. The zoo has also characterized the NhRP as an extremist group attempting to establish a legal precedent. In defense of its animal care practices, the zoo points to its perfect accreditation score from the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA).

John Suthers, an attorney representing the zoo, told CBS News that the zoo takes pride in its care for all animals and meets their specific needs. “The Cheyenne Mountain Zoo has the highest AZA accreditation possible. In fact, it got a perfect score,” Suthers said, underscoring the zoo’s commitment to high standards.

Despite these claims, the NhRP argues that such accreditations mean little in the context of the elephants’ actual living conditions. Fern contends that no ranking can justify the restrictive space in which these animals are kept. She insists that the primary focus of the lawsuit is the welfare of the elephants, not setting a broad legal precedent. “Obviously, if the court were to rule in their favor, it would set an amazing precedent. But right now, we’re focused on the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo,” she explained.

As the case approaches, it remains to be seen whether the Colorado Supreme Court will break new ground in Animal rights law or affirm the lower court’s decision. Either way, the outcome could have lasting implications for how animals in captivity are treated and represented in the legal system.

Please sign this petition to Demand That a Tiger Who Escaped a Zoo Be Sent to a Reputable Sanctuary!

Being publicly-funded gives us a greater chance to continue providing you with high-quality content.Click here to Support Us