Alexis Croswell is a graduate of Grand Valley State University, located in the wonderful mitten... Alexis Croswell is a graduate of Grand Valley State University, located in the wonderful mitten shaped state of Michigan. She became vegan over a period of years sparked by a love of her childhood pet greyhound, Zolo. She has interned with leading animal rights organizations Mercy for Animals, Compassion over Killing, and Farm Sanctuary. She has previously written for local Grand Rapids publications including, Vegangr.com, Doorganics, and Dogs Unleashed. She is excited each day to be a part of the One Green Planet team, and always strives to learn more about the world we all live in. Read more about Alexis Croswell Read More
Want to reach our audience?
Plants created by synthetic biology to save the ecosystem might be something people can get behind, but women giving birth to other species in order to eat them? Um…what?
This is the concept proposed by Ai Hasegawa, and as DeZeen explains the idea, it is “to tackle food shortages and satisfy maternal instincts as the human population burgeons by giving women the option to become surrogates for endangered animals hunted for food.”
Right. If this theoretical idea ever became biologically possible, we’re pretty sure women wouldn’t be lining up to impregnate themselves with tomorrow night’s dinner.
There’s also many other ways women can satisfy maternal instincts: having human babies, babysitting, fostering, volunteering at a childcare center, taking care of another person or animal without being pregnant, the list could go on. The gestation period, along with the complex biological changes that would need to take place for the dolphin to be reared do not lend themselves to “tackling food shortages.” Plant yourself a vegetable garden and call it a day.
In explaining his idea further, Hasegawa says, “Furthermore, gourmets would be able to enjoy the luxury of eating a rare animal: an animal made by their own body, raising questions of the ownership of rare animal life, and life itself.”
Sure, it’s important to raise these types of questions, and invite discussion on different topics. The concept of inter-species impregnation is biologically interesting in some circles, and perhaps there’s a very small handful of people who for whatever reason would find this idea appealing.
However, the concept is not presented to end the extinction of these endangered species, but rather for people with a taste for the exotic to satisfy their palate. It would not only be exploitative to the women who carried these animals, but to the animals themselves. What do you think?
You must be Login to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Keep One Green Planet independent — chip in what you can, or become a member and get ad-free browsing, a voice in our community, and the good feeling of fueling a sustainable, healthier, and kinder world.
Is it common for mothers to eat their children? I mean, if one had to grow an animal inside them and then birth it as they would a human baby, would that not create some kind of maternal attachment or bond? It’s all rather strange in too many ways.
Sick