Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting... Nicholas Vincent is a passionate environmentalist and freelance writer. He is deeply committed to promoting sustainability and finding solutions to the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. Read more about Nicholas Vincent Read More
On June 11, 2026, NOAA declared that El Niño had formed in the tropical Pacific, and forecasters put the odds at 63 percent that it reaches “very strong” status — a super El Niño — between November and January. Since then the outlook has grown more serious, not less: the consensus across major models now points toward a peak around 3.6°C above average, and several forecasters say this could become the strongest El Niño in the modern record. That is not an abstraction. El Niño transfers an enormous pulse of heat from the Pacific into the atmosphere, reshaping rainfall and storm tracks worldwide, and the strongest events bring drought to some regions and catastrophic flooding to others. Scientists also warn of a public health dimension that gets less attention: beyond heat illness itself, big El Niño years are associated with upticks in pest- and water-borne disease including cholera, typhoid, and malaria. And this one is arriving on top of an already warmer ocean and atmosphere. Please sign the petition urging that America’s weather and climate forecasting capacity be protected and fully funded.
The timing is what worries forecasters. For two budget cycles running, the administration has proposed deep cuts to NOAA — roughly a quarter to a third of its budget, elimination of the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, which coordinates the agency’s climate and weather science, and the closure of climate and weather laboratories and cooperative institutes. It is worth being precise about where this stands, because the picture is genuinely mixed. Congress has pushed back on a bipartisan basis and largely preserved NOAA’s funding so far, holding the agency near $6.1 billion for fiscal 2026 and directing it not to close its laboratories; a similar proposal returned for fiscal 2027. NOAA Administrator Neil Jacobs has defended the restructuring, saying internal research would be transferred to operational offices and that it is chiefly extramural research being cut, and some Republican lawmakers have welcomed increases to the National Weather Service budget. Critics counter that the agency has already made what officials described to staff as down payments — hundreds of departures, decommissioned datasets, and disruptions to satellite data during hurricane season. Reasonable people can argue about the right size of a federal agency. The narrower point this petition makes is harder to argue with: the months when a record El Niño peaks are the worst possible moment to be uncertain about who is watching the ocean. One Green Planet has reported on what happens when extreme weather outpaces preparation in climate change claims thousands of lives amid extreme weather events, and the reporting on the budget hearings, including both criticism and the agency’s defense, is available via Inside Climate News.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
Comments: