Michelle is a writer based in St. Louis, Missouri. Her work has appeared in The... Michelle is a writer based in St. Louis, Missouri. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Film Quarterly, and other publications. She earned a Ph.D. in Cinema Studies from New York University. She also enjoys reading, hiking, and arguing with her cat about whether she just ate. Read more about Michelle Kelley Read More
The “greening of hate” is gaining traction.
Pundits and politicians on the right are blaming immigrants for environmental destruction, displacing blame from polluting industries and the wealthy. As the Center for American Progress points out, the development projects of the rich and government subsidization of fossil fuel extraction are the real source of environmental harm.
Yet the right ignores the facts to advance its anti-immigrant agenda. For example, William Perry Pendley, who briefly ran the Bureau of Land Management under President Trump, reportedly views immigration as “one of the biggest threats to public lands.”
Nobody:
Absolutely nobody at all:@BLMNational spokesperson: “Perry Pendley views immigration as one of the biggest threats to public lands… Illegal immigration is a threat to the environment.”
We can't make up this stuff Trump's @Interior pitches to @FoxNews… pic.twitter.com/c0yhrcwwG1
— Democracy Forward (@DemocracyFwd) October 16, 2020
Unfortunately, environmental racism isn’t new. Early environmentalists like Madison Grant, were avowed eugenicists; celebrated conservationist John Muir voiced racist views and advocated restricting immigration.
Environmental racism escalated in the 1970s, along with mounting concerns over population growth. Fear that the planet’s growing population would quickly deplete its resources mixed with anxiety about rising immigration rates. In the 1980s and ‘90s, leaders at environmental nonprofits like EarthFirst!, the Rewilding Institute, and the Sierra Club espoused extremist views and promoted anti-immigrant policies. Former Sierra Club leader John Tanton founded several anti-immigrant groups that make false claims about immigrations’ impact on the planet. (The Sierra Club split with Tanton over his views). The Southern Poverty Law Center has designated these hate groups.
As The Center for American Progress points out, the claims of anti-immigration environmentalists are baseless. In fact, studies suggest immigrants to the U.S. live more sustainably than native-born Americans, and areas with high numbers of immigrants have lower carbon emissions.
Source: euronews (in English)/YouTube
The “greening of hate” is dangerous. It perpetuates false information, stokes xenophobia, and threatens to alienate those who might otherwise Support the environmental movement. It harms people and the planet.
For more Animal, Earth, Life, Vegan Food, Health, and Recipe content published daily, subscribe to the One Green Planet Newsletter! Lastly, being publicly-funded gives us a greater chance to continue providing you with high-quality content. Please consider supporting us by donating!
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
Comments: