Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
Download food monster: the biggest, baddest, yummiest vegan food app!
single

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR Newsletter

  GET FOOD MONSTER AppX
Food Monster - Features

Busted! 3 Huge Myths About GMOs

LIKE OGP ON FACEBOOK :

GMOs have become a contentious topic – with battles for labeling and public awareness of GMO foods at an all-time high, there’s a lot floating around about GMOs out there. And with all of the info from so many different sources, it can be hard sometimes to discern the fact from the “spin.” Here’s a look at some of the most common GMO myths you may see now and in the future:

1. GMOs are irrefutably safe for human consumption

Companies like Monsanto, an obvious proponent of GMO foods, state that “Since farmers first began growing biotech crops in 1996, there has been no credible evidence of harm to humans or animals.” While saying with certainty that GMOs are indisputably and wholly unsafe for human consumption might also be a myth (there are many studies of potential risks documented, but the fact is that there have been no long-term studies of GMOs that can provide conclusive evidence at this time), the fact is that there is no consensus among the scientific community that GMOs are indeed safe for long-term human consumption.

And, then, there’s the issue of who decides what is safe, anyway: Philip Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications, stated: “Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.” The FDA follows a process for evaluating the safety of GMOs, and the organization has “set up a voluntary consultation process to engage with the developers of genetically engineered plants to help ensure the safety of food from these products.”

2. GMOs have been tested for safety and illness on humans

While many people may think GMO foods were tested on humans before allowed on the market, this is simply untrue. Monsanto’s web site explains: “There are not currently any human clinical trials used to test the safety of GM crops.” The Institute for Responsible Technology claims: “FDA scientists had repeatedly warned that GM foods can create unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects, including allergies, toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged long-term safety studies, but were ignored.”

While safety studies have been conducted on animals, there are no known long-term studies of GMOs conducted on humans. And the study of illness potentially caused by GMOs in humans hasn’t been examined: according to Earth Open Source, “GM proponents claim that people have been eating GM foods in the United States for 16 years without ill effects. But this is an anecdotal, scientifically untenable assertion, as no epidemiological studies to look at GM food effects on the general population have ever been conducted. Furthermore, there are signs that all is not well with the US food supply. Reports show that food-related illnesses increased two- to ten-fold in the years between 1994 (just before GM food was commercialized) and 1999.”

3. GMOs can help fight the world hunger problem

GMOs have often been touted as a way to help feed the world hunger crisis. Most current GMO crops are engineered to tolerate herbicides or contain a pesticide on their own. According to Earth Open Source.org, “The two major GM crops, soy and maize, mostly go into animal feed, biofuels to power cars, and processed human food – products for developed nations that have nothing to do with meeting the basic food needs of the poor and hungry. GM corporations are answerable to their shareholders and thus are interested in profitable commodity markets, not in feeding the poor and hungry.” And, we already produce enough food to feed the world’s population, says the UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Even if GMO crops were able to provide more food, then, the root cause of hunger is not a lack of food, but a lack of access to food.” In other words, it’s often a lack of money and resources that causes hunger problems in many cases – and the GMO crop yield isn’t going to solve that anytime soon.

The issue of GMOs – and whether or not you and your family should readily consume and support them – can be a confusing topic. With information coming your way from the FDA, the government, politicians, food companies, food activists, farmers, and friends and family, it really can be tough to discern what’s real and what’s “engineered.” The next time you decide whether or not to support GMOs (or not), consider some of these points, among the many other potential “myths” out there.

Image Source: Alternative Heat/Flickr 

Want to read more posts like this? Sign up for our newsletter below!​

Browse through some recent posts below:

Turkish-Style Green Beans [Vegan, Grain-Free]

Your Heart Will Skip a Beat Over These 15 Beautiful Vegan Beet Recipes

Beet and Chickpea Falafel

The Secrets to Making Vegan Cheese Taste Authentic, According to Bloggers

Raw Cashew Almond Cheese b

Popular International Chain Nando’s Adds 2 Plant-Based Burgers to Menu!

Former Grilled Cheese Truck to Reopen as Vegan Restaurant

Enterprising 19-Year-Old Launches All-Inclusive Vegan Café in England

This Delicious Vegan Schnitzel Won The Innovation Award at a Major Food and Drink Trade Show!

This Plant-Based Cooking School Wants to Change The World By Offering Free or Pay-By-Donation Classes!


Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

21 comments on “Busted! 3 Huge Myths About GMOs”

Click to add comment
Prashant
3 Years Ago

hi nice day


Reply
Jessica Lake
3 Years Ago

...Or how about that genetically modified e.coli bacteria making your synthetic insulin because you have diabetes ?


Reply
Kate Publicover
3 Years Ago

I suppose bacteria that can consume pollution, or modified algae for biodiesel that consumes more CO2 and gives out more oxygen and makes more ethanol are bad too, hmmm?


Reply
Kate Publicover
3 Years Ago

Companies like Monsanto are evil, yes. However, you can't dismiss an amazing scientific technology like this. As said in the article "there's not enough tests done". You could make food with longer shelf life. Or, as they've done in less-fortunate countries, hardier crops or crops that contain more nutrients. Imagine being able to give malnourished children an apple that contained all their required nutrients and minerals for the day. Science and scientists are not the enemy. It's evil companies like Monsanto who are the only basis of this type of thing you have to go by.


Reply
Janet Kay
3 Years Ago

...In this article, Myth #3 GMOs Can Help Fight the World Hunger Problem.... maybe reducing the number of future mouths to feed (through infertility) is actually what they mean!? Hah!


Reply
Janet Kay
3 Years Ago

I just pondered whether infertility/population reduction or 'control' is ACTUALLY Monsanto's hidden agenda here? The Govt supports & protects them, so maybe it's actually part of THEIR agenda.... Thoughts?


Reply
sara
03 Sep 2014

iv thought about it to I find the concept very interesting, possible and in a way logical. I don\'t want to sound paranoid but I would make sense as a non invasive easily hid way to control population growth when we are so over populated without upsetting the general population.

Brenda Hall
3 Years Ago

And guess who PAID for that study? Never trust the company who pays for the study to tell you the truth!


Reply
Steven Weaver
3 Years Ago

its not true..there hasn't been any longer term studies to prove..or disprove it…scary!


Reply
Snack Out Loud
3 Years Ago

Proudly GMO-free over here!


Reply
Brooke Husselstein
3 Years Ago

No.


Reply


Subscribe to our Newsletter




Follow us on


Do Not Show This Again

×

Submit to OneGreenPlanet


Terms & Conditions ×
  GET FOOD MONSTER APPX