Emily is a writer who enjoys reading, wine and food, nature, and simple living. She... Emily is a writer who enjoys reading, wine and food, nature, and simple living. She loves to relax with a good book, and looks forward to hosting social gatherings for friends and family. When Emily is not reading, writing, cooking, or sipping, she is playing with her 2.5 rescued doggies or working in her garden. Read more about Emily Cardiff Read More
It looks like a well-known animal rights organization has a new enemy in the fight for animal welfare. According to paperwork filed with the Federal Election Commission, an organization based in Iowa dedicated to battling, what they are calling, “the radical Animal rights movement” has launched a new super PAC. Super PACs (Political Action Committee) can solicit unlimited contributions legally to produce political advertisements, but only if their spending is not coordinated with a candidates’ campaigns.
The Protect the Harvest Political Action Committee is a “social welfare” nonprofit that seeks to teach the public about “the benefits of farming, ranching and hunting” and to advocate “for the right to conduct such activities.” Their intentions have been made clear to the elections lead that they will be raising funds in “unlimited amounts” to Support the election or defeat of federal candidates — they are looking to protect their rights, freedoms and way of life through legal safeguards for farmers, sportsmen and animal “owners.”
Between October 2011 and December 2012, tax records show about $927,000 raised by Protect the Harvest. However, as a “social welfare” nonprofit, they are not required to publicly disclose donors.
Protect the Harvest says on its website, “the Animal rights movement in America, led by the Humane Society of the United States, has evolved into a wealthy and successful attack group determined to end the consumption of meat, threaten consumer access to affordable food, eliminate hunting, outlaw rodeos and circuses and even ban animal ownership (including pets) altogether.”
This statement did not go without response.
“That’s baloney,” said Joe Maxwell, vice president of outreach and engagement, the Humane Society of the United States. He also says his organization is “leading efforts to ensure that we have good stewards of the land and the animals on our farms.”
Maxwell goes on to say that Protect the Harvest is “nothing but a front group” that is “in bed with industrialized agriculture.”
Image source: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Flickr
You must be Login to post a comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Get your favorite articles delivered right to your inbox! Sign up for daily news from OneGreenPlanet.
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.
Well, the intent of many of us in the AR movement is exactly that. I do experience frustration because in my mind, these types of initiatives are the ones needing public scrutiny and debate invitations.
A group like Protect the Harvest needs to be outed. What better way than have people like Will Tuttle, Richard Schwartz, Michael Greger, Rabbi Dovid Sears, or other scholarly AR advocates, debate these promoters of violence to nature!!!!What good does it do to remain on opposite sides of the ring, jabbing from a distance. Ex Citi Bank VP Phillip Wollen, at St. James Ethics Center, engaged with others regarding the topic, "Should animals be off the menu." Why can\’t something similar be organized with this group?