Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
Download food monster: the biggest, baddest, yummiest vegan food app!
Buy the #EatForThePlanet book



Sexism as a Tactic in Animal Rights Advocacy

Sexism as a Tactic in Animal Rights Advocacy

Many are familiar with PETA’s “Naked Campaign” that has disproportionately featured young, thin, attractive women who are either naked or nearly naked to promote various Nonhuman Animal rights causes.  Indeed, the vast majority of feminist criticisms single out PETA, and rightly so, as they are the largest organization in our movement.  However, I argue that the problem runs much deeper than that.  In recent years, I have seen the objectification of sexualized women’s bodies go from a shameless ploy to “consistently grab headlines,” as PETA explains, to an increasingly normal tactic for the movement at large.

Take for example the British conservation group Fish Love, which features nude celebrities (mostly women) fondling or straddling the corpses of free-living sea animals.  Or, VGirls|VGuys, a site that promotes veganism through the sexualized bodies of attractive men and women.  Female profiles far outnumbering that of men, and women are far more likely to be posed nude or in lingerie or swimsuits.

In 2008, LUSH, a semi-vegan soap and cosmetic company launched a worldwide stunt that encouraged employees (mostly women) to march outside the store wearing nothing but an apron and perhaps some high heels to hand out leaflets on reduced packaging.  Never mind that many of LUSH’s products are still in packaging and that handing out paper leaflets is completely counterintuitive to reducing waste.  LUSH has also launched a campaign to end Nonhuman Animal testing which required a male actor to reenact graphic scenes of torture on a young woman in a nude bodysuit for ten hours in their store window.

Australia’s Animal Liberation Victoria routinely features young, thin, attractive women naked for one campaign or the other—oftentimes intersecting with violence.   Bloodied women are wrapped in plastic like packaged “meat,” strapped to vivisection tables, or curled up in a pool of red paint to protest whaling.  In a world where misogyny and violence against women continues to thrive, the normalization of sexist campaigning that denotes violence and exploits women’s vulnerable social position should be cause for our concern.

Not all sexist tactics are so blatantly problematic, however.  Less conspicuously, restrictive gender roles for women often creep into even those action repertoires that graciously allow women to keep their clothes on.  For instance, our movement tends to reserve the exciting, prestigious, and influential leadership positions for men.  There are considerably more male organization presidents, theorists, authors, radio and podcast hosts, and vegan celebrities.  Women, on the other hand, are relegated to the drudgery of Nonhuman Animal activism—that work which must be accomplished for the success of the movement, but which goes relatively unappreciated.  This includes event organizing, letter writing, fundraising, and other administrative tasks.

Another oft exploited feminine gender role is the expectation that women be nurturing caretakers.  Ecofeminists have embraced this role and reframed it as a positive asset to our advocacy efforts.  Promoting these gender roles, however, reinforces unrealistic expectations that may manipulate some women and exclude others.  And given that our movement is stigmatized as an irrational and overly-emotional lost cause for Bambi and bunny rabbits, explicit reinforcements of feminized advocacy may not be useful.  It may also dismiss men’s capacity for nurturing and caring.


Finally, in activist circles that glorify direct action (tactics that are generally violent and/or illegal), sexism once again becomes a strategy.  Violent direct action is, by and large, supported and promoted by male activists.  Masculine bravado and toughness is valorized.  Like the stereotypes embraced by ecofeminists, the macho fearlessness associated with the male gender role is exploited as a tactic.  Those who do not conform to this identity face humiliation and discrimination.  Not surprisingly, these androcentric tactics are far more likely to imperil one’s personal safety and might entail lengthy jail sentences.  Ascribing to masculinity in our movement can be dangerous business.  Likewise, in actively denouncing pacifism, these activists reject the feminized approach to Nonhuman Animal liberation.  Sexist interpretations of activist behavior shape appropriate and inappropriate activism.  Feminine tactics, in other words, are presented as an example of what not to do.

Gender is a highly politicized social movement tool.  Cultural expectations and social norms dictate how that tool will be wielded.   Unfortunately, these gender norms inevitably reflect stereotypical beliefs and prejudices that often negatively impact both women and men.  The Nonhuman Animal rights movement regularly objectifies and symbolically abuses the bodies of women (and sometimes men) for media exposure and fundraising.  Expectations that men lead while women support them behind the scenes has created a movement led by a few men with women comprising the rank and file.  Expectations that women nurture and men aggressively take risks trivialize women and endanger men.  For all involved, sexist tactics are hugely restrictive and limit our potential.  We should prioritize building a safe and respectful atmosphere for our activists as a means of rejecting inequality, but also as a means to maximize our effectiveness.  We can’t reasonably expect to liberate Nonhuman Animals so long as we refuse to liberate one another.

Want to read more posts like this? Sign up for our newsletter below!​

Browse through some recent posts below:

Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

4 comments on “Sexism as a Tactic in Animal Rights Advocacy”

Click to add comment
4 Years Ago

"We can’t reasonably expect to liberate Nonhuman Animals so long as we refuse to liberate one another." If they can liberate nonhuman animals without including them as equal decision-makers in the movement, and believe the "speciesism is like sexism and animals are like women" rhetoric, then no wonder they believe they don't have to include women as equal decision-makers any more than they have to include cows and chickens as equal decision-makers in the movement.

truthful nacho
4 Years Ago

Noooooooooooo, gender is *imposed*. We are *complaining about that*. Stop shilling for PETA you parasite.

Cynthia Robinson
5 Years Ago

This is the main reason, as an animal lover, that I have not joined PETA. I cannot buy into the naked campaign. What organizations would you recommend who are using men as well as women in a modest but effective way? I really want to get involved but don't know where to invest my time.

5 Years Ago

Do not conflate people using tactics you disagree with with sexism. You are showing that you are sexist against women by claiming that certain forms of activism are feminine while others are masculine. And you have nothing to back up such a silly statement. As well you do a major disservice to women struggling for equality when accusations like this are thrown around. If you disagree with direct action, fine. But do not try to smear those who take part in it and at the same time devalue the true issues of sexism in society.


Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow us on

Do Not Show This Again


Submit to OneGreenPlanet

Terms & Conditions ×