Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
Download food monster: the biggest, baddest, yummiest vegan food app!
single

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR Newsletter

It’s only been about one day since the filmmakers behind “Blackfish” and the team behind “The Cove” (i.e. the Oceanic Preservation Society) challenged SeaWorld to a public debate. And, to really no one’s surprise, SeaWorld has already said “no.”

Pretty fast turnaround, eh?

As the Oceanic Preservation Society (OPS) said in a press release, “We welcome an open and honest discussion with SeaWorld. There are millions of families across the globe who have choices about where to spend their vacation dollars. Parents want clear answers about how all aspects of the captivity industry work, including animal welfare and employee safety.”

This is a pretty inviting sentiment, and an open discussion would allow both sides to have their say, so, SeaWorld, why are you really afraid of a public debate?

Could it be because many of your claims regarding animal welfare are dead wrong? Let’s just take a look back for a moment, shall we?

For one, SeaWorld consistently tells the world that they do not separate orca mothers and calves – except for circumstances that would place a family unit in danger. However, as this timeline clearly shows, there have been 18 orcas at SeaWorld parks that have been separated from their mothers. It’s highly doubtful that all 18 of these orca mother-calf pairs would have placed family units in danger – but it would make it a whole lot more difficult to accommodate certain performances, right?

What’s more, SeaWorld insists that their care of orcas somehow benefits those in the wild, referencing “controlled research” studies of their captive killer whales. But how exactly do controlled research studies like one examining the resting metabolic rate of Tilikum help animals in the wild?

Captive animals and wild animals have completely different lifestyles, feeding routines, and even lifespans (though, on this last item, SeaWorld also wants us to believe that captive orcas have similar lifespans even though most captive orca whales don’t live longer than a nine year average, as compared to up to 90 years in the wild.)

Moreover, in SeaWorld’s recent open letter calling “Blackfish” activist propaganda, they say that Tilikum was not collected by the company, and while he may not have been captured by the marine park first-hand, as the letter later states, SeaWorld still “acquired” Tilikum. So just as long as someone else does the dirty work, it’s okay to bring in a wild orca into you facility? But, oh, it’s for conservation, right?

Yet, this argument cannot hold since, last we checked, forcing animals to do tricks for audiences and keeping them cooped up in concrete pools is not conservation nor is it beneficial to wild orcas.

And even if the whales, Tilikum included, are treated like “royalty” as former SeaWorld trainer Mark Simmons states in a new video created by the company, how does this make their captivity okay? Does this mean that as long as we supposedly treat an animal well, we can then keep it confined for the rest of its life?

But, this is all just a bunch of activist mumbo-jumbo, right, SeaWorld?

Fred, Jacobs, Vice President for Corporate Communications at SeaWorld, said via Chron, that the open debate challenge is “little more than a publicity stunt” and the company has “no interest in helping promote a film this dishonest and manipulative.”

Bridgette Pirtle, a trainer at SeaWorld San Antonio, also voiced similar sentiments, stating, “It is a predictable activist move to challenge SeaWorld to a public debate forum, one that undoubtedly allow the anti-captivity speakers to further push their radical agendas.”

Wait – let’s get this straight – people who are anti-animal captivity are now radical? People who long to see animals back in the wild and free are radical? But capturing (oh, sorry, “acquiring”) a wild-caught orca, and placing them in a tank is not radical? So, you are pro-captivity, SeaWorld? Is that what you mean?

Honestly, we’re not quite sure what you mean at all, SeaWorld, but perhaps if you’d seriously consider sitting down for an open debate maybe we won’t be so confused, or quite so angry. Maybe, just maybe, an intelligent and fact-based discussion could take place and perhaps even some kind of agreement would be reached, because, SeaWorld, no one would be mad if you turned into a real open sea pen sanctuary. In fact, most would probably rejoice, and your orcas would, too.

Image source: Josh Hallett / Flickr

Want to read more posts like this? Sign up for our newsletter below!​

Browse through some recent posts below:

Join the Remarkable Kids Who Are Fighting to Retire Denver Aquarium’s Tigers!

Marineland Canada’s Cruelty Charges May Have Been Withdrawn But Here’s Why This is Still a Win

This Dog Lost Her Cat BFF, But These Foster Kittens Are Putting Her Heart Back Together!

A Cruel Person Kicked This Puppy Out of a Moving Car – Luckily the Right People Stepped In


Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

20 comments on “No Surprise: SeaWorld Quickly Wimps Out of Public Debate Challenge”

Click to add comment
markgil
3 Years Ago

it's always the same-the exploiters claim that people who speak out against their oppression and exploitation have a "radical agenda"- i can't count the number of times i have heard that being vegan is radical and extreme. when looking at things from a logical perspective, which is more extreme and radical; living with kindness, compassion and non-violence or enslaving, abusing and burtally murdering countless billions of sentient beings for pleasure and profit? i am reminded of 2 quotes: “Whoever is content with the world, and who profits from its lack of justice, does not want to change it.” -Friedrich Durrenmatt "In fact, if one person is unkind to an animal it is considered to be cruelty, but where a lot of people are unkind to animals, especially in the name of commerce, the cruelty is condoned and, once large sums of money are at stake, will be defended to the last by otherwise intelligent people." — Ruth Harrison


Reply
Erin Cole
3 Years Ago

Mary, I don't think anyone is saying they are being mistreated by the trainers. The point is they should not be in captivity. Its cruel. All of these animals deserve to live in their natural habitat. Not be forced into performing for people or bred to do the same. It's pretty simple actually. It needs to stop.


Reply
Kara Elyse
3 Years Ago

Jessica


Reply
Cherrie
3 Years Ago

SeaWorld – you don’t have a leg to stand on! Killer Whales contained for the purpose of human entertainment etc- You SeaWorld are the one who is dishonest and manipulative – The only thing that SeaWorld really cares about is money – did you hear that Fred Jacobs! I would love to see you discuss your activities with Dr. Paul Spong (has spent more than 30 years researching orcas) and Ric O’Barry – you would be eaten alive. Shame SeaWorld don’t have the backbone to answer the difficult questions – why- because there is no logical answer to what you are doing.


Reply
Sue Rolfe
3 Years Ago

Collapsed dorsal fin. that poor creature. He must think man is insane for wanting to watch him on his belly in a tiny tank with a collapsed dorsal fin than to see him in his natural habitat, the ocean. Perhaps man is insane.


Reply
Michaela McLaughlin
3 Years Ago

Emma Brandenburg


Reply
Glenn Smith
3 Years Ago

Need to close Dolphin Cove, Key Largo, too!


Reply
Trent Schlenker
3 Years Ago

If not, I think you're just being ignorant and burying your head in the sand. Can you try to imagine living as a dolphin in those conditions. Empathy. Try it.


Reply
Trent Schlenker
3 Years Ago

That should be a red flag for the people defending seaworld.


Reply
Mary Eddy
3 Years Ago

Are you THERE at Seaworld to see for yourselves how they care for the animals? Didn't think so.


Reply


Subscribe to our Newsletter




Follow us on


Do Not Show This Again

×

Submit to OneGreenPlanet


Terms & Conditions ×