Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
single

Can Sustainable Seafood Labels be Trusted?

Can Sustainable Seafood Labels be Trusted?

On Earth Day 2012, Whole Foods Market, the natural food superstore announced that it would no longer carry fish considered unsustainable. By taking this step, they became the only national food chain that does not sell ‘red-coded’, or ‘unsustainably harvested’ fish.

While many applauded Whole Foods for taking a step in the right direction, some scientists are questioning whether sustainable seafood delivers on its promise.

A new study published in the journal Marine Policy, two major fisheries certification programs, the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and the Friend of the Sea (FOS), for certifying stocks of fish that may not be sustainable.

Biologist Rainer Froese of the Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research in Germany and his co-author Alexander Proelss of the University of Trier in Germany examined 71 MSC-certified stocks and 76 FOS-certified stocks, including species of mackerel, swordfish and tuna, and concluded that 31% of the stocks labelled as sustainable by the MSC and 19% of FOS-certified stocks do not deserve the label.

Froese told Nature at the World Fisheries Congress in Edinburgh that pressure is mounting on certification bodies to clean up their acts, with increasing numbers of scientists and non-governmental organizations raising objections to the schemes

These criticisms are consistent with a 2010 paper by conservation scientist Jennifer Jacquet, marine biologist Daniel Pauly and others in Nature, where the group claimed that the MSC was failing to protect the environment and needed radical reform.

The MSC forcefully disagrees with Froese and Proelss’ conclusions, but both sides did agree that if you’re going to eat fish, buying certified seafood is still the best option.

Considering that 17 of the world’s major fishing estuaries are over-fished. Seven of the top ten marine fish species are fully exploited or over-exploited, and nearly 90 percent of all large predatory fish in the ocean are now gone, why not take a bigger step and avoid all sea food?

There is no physiological need for humans to eat fish. Like all meat, fish has no magical property that can only be found in its flesh. Plants provide omega 3 fatty acids and protein without the saturated fat, cholesterol, possible mercury, heavy metals and destruction of the oceans that surely come with a meal of fish. Plants also provide a surplus of nutrients that are lacking in animal sources.

So ditch the labels and the seafood and you’ll be also ditching one of the most wasteful and destructive industries on the planet!

Image Source: Gary Knight/Flickr

Browse through some recent posts below:


Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

0 comments on “Can Sustainable Seafood Labels be Trusted?”

Sign on with:


Subscribe to our Newsletter




Follow us on


Do Not Show This Again

×

Submit to OneGreenPlanet


Terms & Conditions ×