Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
Download food monster: the biggest, baddest, yummiest vegan food app!
Buy the #EatForThePlanet book



A young body boarder sadly died following a shark bite off Reunion Island, a French territory near the coast of Madagascar. Surfing champion Kelly Slater called for a “massive shark cull” in the area as a reaction to the young man’s death.

Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 2.12.19 PM

The International Fund for Animal Welfare wishes to extend our sincere condolences to the family and friends of the deceased, Alexandre Naussance. And we appreciate what Kelly Slater has done for ocean conservation.

However, killing sharks is not the right way to prevent such tragedies.

In response to similar calls for shark culls in Australia, New South Wales Premier Mike Baird has stated unequivocally that all the scientific data available shows that culls do not work as intended to protect people. In fact, culls can instead do serious harm to the ecosystem.

In an article in The Conversation, Jane Williamson, Associate Professor in Marine Ecology, Macquarie University, asserts “we would be far better off allocating resources to achieving a greater understanding of the ecology and behavior of these large predators. We can increase knowledge of why and where sharks are likely to attack humans by tagging sharks and following their movements over time.” She goes on to explain that “non-invasive methods of mitigation are currently being developed, including the use of erratic walls of bubbles to deter sharks, and the development of wetsuits and surfboards that sharks are less likely to mistake as prey. ”

A French TV channel explained that “conditions were favorable” for such an attack in the infamously dangerous Mât River mouth, since a flood recently had muddied the waters. That is why the Region’s Prefecture reiterated that “swimming and water sports were forbidden in that zone.” Moreover, fishermen had spotted the presence of a shark and had already raised an alert.

It seems important to bear in mind that various anthropogenic (human-caused) factors are the cause of most shark attacks, in particular, overfishing. When sharks’ prey species dwindle due to overexploitation, sharks migrate towards other environments to find food. In these new environs, sharks can confuse surfers and body boarders with sea turtles or seals—normal shark prey. This is made more likely if the waters are unclear as was the case with this latest incident.

It is paramount that we do not use this tragedy at Reunion Island to promote a disastrous cull, but rather to promote the protection of the seas, the ocean and all species that inhabit it.

Of the 500 shark species identified worldwide, thirty are threatened or near-threatened with extinction, according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The global shark fin market claims more than 100 million sharks every year, according to a study published in the scientific journal, Marine Policy. In other words, an average of up to 11,000 sharks are killed every hour, three sharks every second. 

Many people perceive sharks as frightening beasts of the sea due to numerous sensational films and media reports; however, these animals are indispensable to marine ecosystems because they contribute to a complicated food web and have done so for more than 430 million years.

At the top of the food chain, these “super-predators” feed on other carnivorous fish that eat herbivores. Without sharks, the balance would be disrupted. For example, without sharks, their prey, (smaller carnivorous fish) would proliferate. Those fish consume more herbivores and without them algae would grow prolifically, smothering coral.

These animals require special protection because of their current vulnerability and because they are essential predators in the ocean’s ecosystems.

It is important to identify non-lethal solutions to ensure a peaceful cohabitation with sharks and protect beach goers and boaters from the potential risks involved in ocean activities.

Image source: wildestanimal/Shutterstock

Want to read more posts like this? Sign up for our newsletter below!​

Browse through some recent posts below:

Why We’re Not Going to Tell You to Go Vegan…

Why We're Not Going to Tell You to Go Vegan...

Time to Get Real. There Aren’t Plenty of Fish in the Sea and It’s Our Fault

Yikes! New Study Finds That We've Grossly Underestimated the Volume of Overfishing

7 Amazing People Who Prove That Living Plastic-Free is Possible

700 Marine Species Might Go Extinct Because of Plastic Pollution. Here Are 5 Ways You Can Help!

700 Marine Species Might Go Extinct Because of Plastic Pollution. Here Are 5 Ways You Can Help!

Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

0 comments on “Why Sharks Should Not Be Culled to Protect Surfers”

Click to add comment
2 Months Ago

Do you really think it is ok to put the protection of sharks over the protection of humans? You make it sound like we are inferior to them. People have said "It\'s their habitat, we should not invade it," but you have already invaded other animals habitats. Sharks are dangerous. So why are we ignoring the problem? Shark population NEEDS to be controlled asap.

Joseph P Rovira
1 Years Ago

What you guys don\'t realize is that children are getting killed by these Bull Sharks. This is one of the most prolific creatures on earth. They live in fresh or salt water and when they attack they will not stop until you\'re dead. Tiger Sharks, they do need protection. Though, I can\'t help but think about what you would do if your backyard was crawling with rattlesnakes. Stay out of the backyard, move elsewhere or ignore the problem and hope your child or pet did not wander out back. When people start saying, stay out of their habitat, I can\'t help wonder if you even know what your habitat is. I\'m sorry but between my child or a bull shark, there is no question on who I would protect and I would use any means available.

Cenk Tekin
1 Years Ago

" IFAW doesn\'t care about the death or suffering of humans, only animals." would have been a shorter and more honest article.

08 Apr 2017

And what\'s your point, Cenk?

There are almost 8 billion humans and we are killing off the environment. If you don\'t want to risk getting killed by a shark, stay out of THEIR habitat.


john pasqua
1 Years Ago


1 Years Ago

More people died from taking selfies last year... should we do a cull on ignorant people? No.

Nigel Goodman
04 Mar 2017

Texting while driving kills 6,000 annually in the U.S. alone

Cenk Tekin
08 Mar 2017

It would have been a better analogy if you have suggested banning mobile phones.

damon vomiero
11 Apr 2018

we should not cull pour innocent sharks. we kill more sharks than what they kill us

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow us on

Do Not Show This Again


Submit to OneGreenPlanet

Terms & Conditions ×