Welcome Green Monsters! We're your online guide to making conscious choices that help people, animals and the planet.
Download food monster: the biggest, baddest, yummiest vegan food app!
single

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR Newsletter

  GET FOOD MONSTER AppX

Animal lovers have many reasons to be wary of visiting zoos, aquariums, or other facilities that display animals for entertainment purposes. Captive elephants frequently experience foot problems, obesity, and psychological issues related to their lack of adequate space and stimulation in zoos. These elephants often engage in repetitive stereotypic behaviors such as head-bobbing, wobbling from side to side, or restless pacing: behaviors that are frequently witnessed in captive animals of all kinds. Self-mutilation and outbursts of aggression have been recorded in captive orcas, lions, and tigers, to name a few.

Depression is rife among zoo animals – and zookeepers’ widespread use of mood-enhancing drugs such as Prozac is an open secret among insiders within the animal captivity industry. The recent death of Arturo – a severely depressed polar bear who spent most of his life languishing in a tiny, swelteringly hot tank in Mendoza, Argentina – demonstrated exactly how tragic it can be when we humans prioritize our desire for profit or entertainment above the health and wellbeing of the animals with whom we share this planet.

The Conservation Questions

The question of whether animals should be kept in zoos at all – and if so, whether this should be done for conservation or entertainment purposes – can be extremely divisive and controversial. Many institutions that claim to be holding animals in captivity under the guise of “conservation” have, in fact, been revealed to be exploiting the animals to make a profit. In addition to this, the question of zoos’ supposed “importance” in the fight to save endangered animal species has been hotly disputed.

Zoos rarely release animals back into the wild, as their attempts at captive breeding usually fail because of poor conditions and the stress of captivity. In 2013, a report from the Aspinall Foundation – carried out by leading conservation geneticist Dr. Paul O’Donoghue – described UK zoo animals as “genetic disasters” because of high rates of in-breeding and hybridization, caused by the low supply of captive animals available to the zoos. Most successful wild reintroduction programs are carried out by government agencies and non-profit organizations. In addition, animals who have been raised in captivity are often poorly equipped to adapt to a life in the wild, as they have never had the opportunity to learn the relevant survival skills. Wild animals have demonstrated a worrying lack of interest in mating with captive-born members of the same species.

In comparison to the more effective wild habitat conservation efforts, zoos’ reintroduction programs are also prohibitively expensive and complicated to carry out. According to a Zoo Inquiry by wildlife conservation group Born Free, the annual maintenance cost of keeping a black rhino in captivity is $16,800, while the annual cost of protecting enough natural habitat to support one wild black rhino if just $1,000. The Inquiry estimated that it can be 100 times more expensive to maintain a group of elephants in captivity for one year than it is to conserve a similar group of wild elephants, together with their entire ecosystem, over the same time period.

What would it mean for an animal species to go extinct in the wild, but still exist in a zoo?

shutterstock_33248197/Shutterstock

According to Azzedine Downes, director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), the “live storage facilities” that zoos usually end up becoming are “a discouraging acquiescence to a world without animals roaming in the wild.” His comment illustrates the sad reality of how it would feel to live a world in which animals are erased from their natural environment, to be held only as exhibits for our curiosity. Ultimately, when we visit a zoo, we are seeing a watered-down, confined, apathetic version of the free-spirited beings that captive animals would be in the wild.

Over the past forty years, the planet has lost 52 percent of its wildlife, with most of this loss driven by human activities. Therefore, a sad, apathetic world without wild animals could soon be a reality, unless we all play our part in ending the scourge of species extinction today.

For more information on why relying on zoos to save endangered animals may not be such a great idea, and how you can take action in your everyday life to protect our planet’s wildlife, check out the resources below.

Lead Image Source: /Shutterstock

Want to read more posts like this? Sign up for our newsletter below!​

Browse through some recent posts below:

This Hilarious, Fun-Filled Turkey Is Changing Hearts as an Ambassador for His Kind

Keep This Checklist in Mind Before You Adopt an Animal This Holiday Season

How to Help Your Senior Dog or Cat Deal With Arthritis

5 Ways You Can Give Back to Animals Over the Holidays


Disclosure: One Green Planet accepts advertising, sponsorship, affiliate links and other forms of compensation, which may or may not influence the advertising content, topics or articles written on this site. Click here for more information.

40 comments on “Why it’s a Problem if Animals Go Extinct in the Wild, but Continue to Exist in Zoos”

Click to add comment
Sample
7 Months Ago

Nice Post, keep sharing like this.
http://www.wikipedia.org


Reply
May Lennox-Milton
1 Years Ago

Sad picture,I wonder what the wee soul is thinking


Reply
May Lennox-Milton
1 Years Ago

Sad picture,I wonder what the wee soul is thinking


Reply
Myô Go
1 Years Ago

Parce que l'homme est fou.


Reply
Myô Go
1 Years Ago

Parce que l'homme est fou.


Reply
Marnie Johnson
1 Years Ago

People protecring animals in zoos and the people destroying animals and natural habitats are two TOTALLY different things. Who will pay for the sanctuaries...worldwide...to protect these animals. The zoo's I know in Australia would love to see that happen but don't have the money. Who will pay for it??


Reply
Marnie Johnson
1 Years Ago

People protecring animals in zoos and the people destroying animals and natural habitats are two TOTALLY different things. Who will pay for the sanctuaries...worldwide...to protect these animals. The zoo's I know in Australia would love to see that happen but don't have the money. Who will pay for it??


Reply
GABRIELA VARGAS
1 Years Ago

NO IMPORTA LO QUE DIGAN, SERÍA UNA REALIDAD INSOPORTABLE Y DEPRIMENTE QUE LOS ANIMALES EXISTIERAN EN EL CAUTIVERIO DE UN CIRCO O ZOOLÓGICO Y DESAPARECIERAN DE LA NATURALEZA, SERÍA UN MUNDO DE TERROR Y UNA VIDA DE MISERIA PARA LOS ANIMALES. LO MEJOR SIEMPRE SERÁN LAS RESERVAS Y SANTUARIOS NATURALES BAJO LA CUSTODIA DE LEYES QUE SALVAGUARDEN LA VIDA SILVESTRE, LIBRE Y EN BIENESTAR ABSOLUTO DE LOS ANIMALES. SI LOS ANIMALES SÓLO EXISTIERAN EN CAUTIVERIO Y NO EN LA NATURALEZA SERÍA UNA PESADILLA COMO LA QUE VIVEN LOS ANIMALES DE GRANJAS INDUSTRIALES Y EL SER HUMANO ABUSARÍA EXCESIVAMENTE DE ELLOS. NO QUEREMOS CAUTIVERIO NI PRISIÓN DE NINGÚN TIPO PARA LOS ANIMALES. EN EL CASO DE CAUTIVERIO ES PREFERIBLE LA EXTINCIÓN!!!!!


Reply
Leah Lipinski
1 Years Ago

Thank you John I agree wholeheartedly


Reply
Leah Lipinski
1 Years Ago

Thank you John I agree wholeheartedly


Reply


Subscribe to our Newsletter




Follow us on


Do Not Show This Again

×

Submit to OneGreenPlanet


Terms & Conditions ×
  GET FOOD MONSTER APPX